ASSESSMENT PLAN
(Revised, 1997-98)
All English education majors will participate in student teaching experiences in the
public schools and will be evaluated and graded on that experience. Exit interviews and
data will help evaluate the success of that experience.
_______________Revised, 1994-95
All English education majors will participate in student teaching experiences in the
public schools and will be evaluated and graded on that experience. Exit interviews and
data will help evaluate the success of that experience.
_______________
Our education majors, in addition to the
senior seminars, do student teaching. |
1999-2000 ASSESSMENT
There continue to be problems in our ability to track student success in the
student-teaching capstone experience. A suggestion to the Assessment Committee from Martha
Kruse, who teaches 424 and mentors student teachers, involves using an evaluation measure
sent to the cooperating teachers under whom our students are teaching. By 2003 there will
be a week set aside between student teaching and graduation during which student
teachers classroom experiences can be evaluated, but some direct assessment of our
students skills and abilities in the classroom carried out by the cooperating
teachers would enhance our ability to monitor student success. The gap in time between
completion of the teaching methods course (424) and the student teaching capstone
experience continues to be a problem. As the methods course shifts to Level 3 in 2003,
there will need to be a major refocus on student teaching replacing the methods course as
a true capstone. |
1998-99 ASSESSMENT
In the past, classroom visits were conducted routinely in conjunction with the teaching
methods Capstone Course, 424. Currently the student teachers must request visits from the
Department, and consequently observation and tracking processes are intermittent at best.
Another problem that became apparent this year was the gap of time some students now
experience between the capstone course (424) and the capstone experience (student
teaching). The two aspects of the students programs are growing increasingly
separated. |
1997-98 ASSESSMENT
Due to students now doing student teaching for a full semester, they no longer teach in
the same semester that they take their methods class. Whereas the methods instructor
formerly made classroom visits to students during their ten-week student teaching
assignment, it is now much more difficult to keep track of where our student teachers have
been placed. While anecdotal evidence suggests that our student teachers continue to find
employment in their content areas, the department might consider establishing a more
formal system of exit interviews since the methods instructor may not visit each student
teacher in his/her cooperating school. As the College of Education investigates the
possibility of having faculty in the content areas participate in the supervision of
student teachers, we will need to negotiate such matters as course releases and other
reassignment of the method instructors duties. |
1996-97
ASSESSMENT
The English Department continues to monitor and assess the progress of its education
majors through regular academic advising with an English department faculty member,
on-site visits by the English methods instructor to student teachers in their cooperating
schools, an informal system of exit interviews conducted between graduating seniors and
faculty members, and feedback from cooperating teachers and university supervisors
regarding student teachers' performance. Our student teachers displayed good classroom management skills as well as
good relationships with their classroom teachers. Many are hired for what openings are
available in the cooperating schools.
Cooperating teachers and university
supervisors rate each student teacher's performance on a 1-5 scale, 5 indicating
"exemplary methods/skills beyond the Standard." This year, all of our student
teachers majoring in English scored a 4 or 5 on every indicator, with 6 categories out of
15 registering a straight 5. Students share their student teaching experiences in
roundtable discussions at the English Department's Annual Student Conference on Language
and Literature. Both of these means confirmed that our students are well prepared for
student teaching. |
1995-96
ASSESSMENT
The English department monitors and assesses the progress of its education majors through
a number of measures, including
- regular academic advising with an English
department faculty member;
- on-site visits by the English methods
instructor to student teachers in their cooperating schools;
- an informal system of exit interviews
conducted between graduating seniors and faculty members;
- feedback from cooperating teachers and
university supervisors regarding student teachers' performance.
Again, students who had completed their student teaching experiences conducted a
roundtable discussion for other students at the English Department's Annual Student
Conference on Language and Literature.
|
1994-95
ASSESSMENT
Seniors with education majors participated in student teaching experiences in area public
schools under the supervision of the English Department supervisor, Education Department
personnel, and public school instructors. The students were evaluated and graded. In
addition, the English Department's Annual Student Conference on Language and Literature
included a Roundtable of student teachers who reported on their student teaching
experiences to the department and future teachers. |
1993-94
ASSESSMENT
One section of the Student Conference on Language and Literature is a report from a panel
of student teachers, allowing both the department and future student teachers to become
more aware of the extent to which our academic preparation fits student teachers for their
experience in the schools.v |
|
assessment
home | department means
| department home
17 May 2005
academicpublications@unk.edu |