ASSESSMENT PLAN
Every student who completes a degree program is offered the opportunity to participate in
an evaluation of program effectiveness in conjunction with the program review process. |
1999-2000 ASSESSMENT
|
1998-99 ASSESSMENT
Ten School Counseling program graduates completed the survey with a mean rating of 4.47 (5
= highest rating).
Fourteen Community Counseling program graduates completed the survey with a meaning rating
of 4.30.A concern related to the
effectiveness of the career and lifestyle development program component was identified.
Efforts directed at this concern include focusing on this expertise as a faculty position
is filled. |
1997-98 ASSESSMENT
Ten School Counseling program graduates completed the survey with a mean rating of 4.15
(5=highest possible rating). Nine Community Counseling program graduates completed the
survey with a mean rating of 4.38 (5=highest possible rating) No concerns were expressed
requiring department response. |
1996-97
ASSESSMENT
Of the program graduates, 54% completed a graduate follow-up survey, assessing program
effectiveness. The average rating was 4.08 (5 = excellent), a high level of professional
preparation. Many of our students
come from Residence Life. Alumni from that field suggested that an option in Student
Affairs would be helpful. In response to this, the Department sought and received
University approval for the Student Affairs program option. Many students transferred from
the other options to this as soon as it was available, confirming the demand for this
program. |
1995-96
ASSESSMENT
Of the program graduates, 61% completed a graduate follow-up study. The average rating was
4.33 on a 5-point scale (5 = excellent). The evaluation of graduates indicates a high
level of professional preparation. |
1994-95
ASSESSMENT
Of the program graduates 63% completed a graduate follow-up study. The average rating was
4.22 on a 5-point scale (5 = excellent). The evaluation of graduates indicate a high level
of professional preparation. |
1993-94
ASSESSMENT
Twenty-three students completed a graduate follow-up study. The average rating was 4.2 on
a 5 point scale (5 = excellent).Changes Resulting from The Assessment Process: 1993-94 |
